<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is a list loop faster than an array loop?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chafic.com/2003/08/22/why-is-a-list-loop-faster-than-an-array-loop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chafic.com/2003/08/22/why-is-a-list-loop-faster-than-an-array-loop/</link>
	<description>Technical discussion of Flex, Flash, and RIA development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bokel</title>
		<link>http://chafic.com/2003/08/22/why-is-a-list-loop-faster-than-an-array-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>bokel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rewindlife.com/?p=56#comment-218</guid>
		<description>This is how flash works:
An array is implemented by a list with numeric indices. If you access array[index], index is converted to its string representation beforehand. This conversion is expensive.
Maybe CF works the same ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how flash works:<br />
An array is implemented by a list with numeric indices. If you access array[index], index is converted to its string representation beforehand. This conversion is expensive. </p>
<p>Maybe CF works the same ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

