Comments on: invalidateStyle needs invalidation itself

By: Bob Staple

Bob Staple — Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:26:30 +0000

Guten Tag - Hier ist ein sehr schooner Site. Cheap Staples

Danke!
Bob Staple

By: bad credit loans

bad credit loans — Tue, 02 Nov 2004 19:34:29 +0000

Hello there,

Iwas browsing the web and found this blog. Some interesting quotes. Keep them coming!

Alice
bad credit loans

By: darron

darron — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 00:42:28 +0000

It’s things like this that really get frustrating.

I really wish Macromedia would spend time to think things through from start to finish rather than rush products out the door. I think they’d see their stocks improve too if they could actually MEET the expections they give their customers. We don’t want a ton of new features, we want features that WORK without having to wait for the “next version” to come along to fix it.

The only reason they can get away with this level of quality is because there aren’t any competitors for Flash. That needs to change.. and soon.

Check out this post from Nigel on FlashCoders that just enforces the “rush out the door” mentality and seemingly lack of planning.

http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi/1/88333

By: damn

damn — Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:16:16 +0000

With a lot of excuse to everybody…
All we get from FMX2004 is a bunch of waste code and abstruse ‘hooks’ within predefined classes. Where is the documentation? After paying so much money for brand new Flash we have to dig for life-saving crumbs and waste the time on it. However, thanx a lot for info ::sigh::

By: Fernando

Fernando — Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:08:42 +0000

Exactly. I checked how the styling works with this new framework and i was really dissapointed with it.

Check my post here:

http://www.onelx.com/blog/en/archives/000203.php

cheers